we have three approach to quantizing bosonic string:
1.1 covariant canonical quantization
1.2 light cone gauge ....
2 path integral ....
for 1.1, we keep Lorentz symmetry along the way and add Virasoro constraint to pick out physical state.
question: why level matching must hold? since in 2 there still may have gravitational anomaly.
for 1.2, we first solve the constraint and then check the consistency with Lorentz algebra, or in another way let the first non-tachyon state to be massless or do some Riemann zeta function regularization.
question: why 26D-Lorentz symmetry linked with massless state (I think its within Lie group representation theory but im not familiar with that).
1.1 covariant canonical quantization
1.2 light cone gauge ....
2 path integral ....
for 1.1, we keep Lorentz symmetry along the way and add Virasoro constraint to pick out physical state.
question: why level matching must hold? since in 2 there still may have gravitational anomaly.
for 1.2, we first solve the constraint and then check the consistency with Lorentz algebra, or in another way let the first non-tachyon state to be massless or do some Riemann zeta function regularization.
question: why 26D-Lorentz symmetry linked with massless state (I think its within Lie group representation theory but im not familiar with that).