当小说看还行

坐在一个经不起推敲的所谓科学体系内怀疑别人是可笑的

什么是科学精神就是怀疑啊

请注意，这是小说，不是科学，你怎么能把他当成科学书籍来看呢，本来立场就不对，还喷他老骗子，那岂不是写修仙小说科幻小说的都是成了骗子

Of course, the main condition to accepting this theory is that Sitchin has a special expertise in interpreting ancient texts. Others are not quite ready to give him so much credit. Robert Todd Carroll's Skeptic's Dictionary explains Sitchin's position:
"Sitchin's claim to fame is announcing that he alone correctly reads ancient Sumerian clay tablets. All other scholars have misread these tablets which, according to Sitchin, reveal that gods from another planet (Niburu, which orbits our Sun every 3,600 years) arrived on Earth some 450,000 years ago and created humans by some genetic engineering with female apes."
Ian Lawton talked to a Sumerian linguist (who requested anonymity to avoid the onslaught of hate-mail from ancient astronaut believers). The linguist confirms Sitchin's "special" understanding of Sumerian is not that special:
"[Sitchin] demonstrates a consistent lack of appreciation of even some of the most basic fundamentals of Sumerian and Akkadian grammar, even to the extent of regularly failing to distinguish between the two entirely different languages, and mixing words from each in interpreting the syllables of longer compound words." This mixing of languages allows Sitchin to make amazing "discoveries."
Sitchin argues the reverse, claiming that his special and unique ability to understand and decipher Sumerian texts proves the visitation of the Anunnaki. Remember, Sitchin claims to be the only person in the world capable of accurately translating the texts. Sitchin says his Sumerian comprehension led him to Akkadian Seal VA243, which he claims shows an accurate view of the universe through the use of small dots to represent the planets. Unfortunately, the size of the dots does not correlate to the size of the planets.
by Zecharia Sitchin's World
——————————————————————————————————————
西琴吹自己是唯一能正确解读文本的，结果连苏美语，阿卡德语基本原理认知都缺乏。（注：这个**骗子很搞笑，苏美语阿卡德语究竟怎么回事，他都区分不了）

杠精！心态是崩了么！我觉得地球编年史脑洞很大，开开脑洞挺好。总比三棍子打不出来一个屁的好，只会在旁边犬吠！

@summervb 我不介意重新再花时间，翻书再逐步逐步发贴吧。整本书全是漏洞，“基于自己的发现批西芹”，这实在简单不过。

所以你认为进化论是对的吗

这个本来就是一本小说，楼主怎么不能接受文化色彩呢？也是搞笑

我是觉得分开看吧 ， 科学进步需要被否定和一些异想天开的脑洞， 这都没问题。 是不是骗子，这个从来都是说不清的，地圆说，引力等等，都会随着时间推移被人进一步了解。所以他骗不骗改变不了看书的人对这本书的认识，有疯狂的信众就有疯狂的排斥着，一向如此

你拿着一个你认为正确的小问题去怼别人这么庞大的系统和认知，怕不是丢尽了过人的脸

把这当小说看进行了，稍微有点脑子都知道，许多都是猜测，作者自己的脑洞而已，根本不是科学。看着图个乐呵，增加一下自己的想象力。楼主没必要跟一些愚昧的人较真。因为他们的知识水平和层次都相对较低，跟他们说了他们也不懂，只是在对牛弹琴。

楼主非常用心，在这领域肯定也是下功夫了。但是首先你要知道，你所看见的，都是别人想让你看见的。卢浮宫给出的翻译，就是真相么？千年前的文字，能准确解读出来吗？你的论点就是卢浮宫的这个翻译，可是你能确保它是真相？你质疑西芹，那我质疑协会，质疑卢浮宫，质疑这个官方翻译。